Have you joined the frenetic, unstoppable race to introduce new technologies at all costs? Does your institution place the improvement of its own image
and financial gains before the patient’s best interest? Could this be a reason for the spiralling costs of medical care?
Are we rushing ahead without going through the necessary intermediate steps when it comes to introducing new techniques?
The case of lung cancer could be exemplary:
- Sophisticated technology is used including PET/CT imaging for target volume delineation, IMRT and respiratory gating for optimal target coverage and organs at risk sparing
- But an increase in normal tissue toxicity is reported, maybe not only due to the use of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
- Question: what dose calculation method is being used?
During the seminar recent clinical results of thoracic radiotherapy will be reviewed by Suresh Senan, Professor of Clinical Experimental Radiotherapy at the
VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam. See the list of references he has recommended. Professor René-Olivier Mirimanoff will address the important topic
of volume delineation. And we have enlisted Anders Ahnesjö, Professor at the University of Uppsala, to present the current concepts in dose calculations.
In order to better address this issue, he has suggested that, prior to the meeting, a state of today’s practice in Switzerland be established and justified.
So, with the soon to be released official invitation and programme of the seminar, you will receive a brief questionnaire about the planning and delivery of
lung cancer treatments in your institution.
The seminar will close with a 60 minutes round table discussion during which a set of joint recommendations could be drafted.
Program
List of references:
- Katrien De Jaeger et al.
Incorporating an improved dose-calculation algorithm in conformal radiotherapy of lung cancer:
re-evaluation of dose in normal lung tissue
Radiother Oncol 69 (2003); 1-10
- Wilfried De Neve, Carlos De Wagter
Letter to the Editor: Lethal pneumonitis in a phase I study of chemotherapy and IMRT for NSCLC:
The need to investigate the accuracy of dose computation
Radiother Oncol 75 (2005); 246-247
- Steven J. Frank et al.
Treatment planning for lung cancer: traditional homogeneous point-dose prescription compared with heterogeneity-corrected
dose-volume prescription
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56 (2003); 1308-1318
- Hoon K. Lee et al.
Postoperative pulmonary complications after pre-operative chemoradiation for esophageal carcinoma: correlation with pulmonary
dose-volume histogram parameters
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003); 1317-1322
- Hidetoshi Saitoh et al.
Dose distribution of narrow beam irradiation for small lung tumor
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002); 1380-1387
- Suresh Senan et al.
Literature-based recommendations for treatment planning and execution in high-dose radiotherapy for lung cancer
Radiother Oncol 71 (2004); 139-146
- Elisabeth Weiss et al.
Letter to the editor concerning Senan et al., [Radiother Oncol 2004;71:139-146]
Radiother Oncol 74 (2005); 346-347
Download Presentations
(right-click on PDF-icon and "Save as..." or similar)
 |
A. Ahnesjö Current Concepts in Dose Calculations |
 |
I. Letovanec
Lung Cancer Pathology - Selected Topics |
 |
P. Manser Irradiation Techniques |
 |
R.O. Mirimanoff Defining GTV and CTV in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) |
 |
J.-Y. Ray Dose Plan Evaluation |
 |
S. Senan Clinical outcomes and state of the art techniques |